Have a Claim?

Click here for a confidential contact or call:

1-212-350-2774
Page 83 of 108

October 27, 2015

The St. Joe Company, a Florida-based real estate developer and landowner, its former top executives, and two former accounting department directors, agreed to pay, collectively, $3.725 million in penalties and disgorgement to settle SEC claims of improperly accounting for the declining value of residential real estate developments during the financial crisis.  According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings, the respondents repeatedly failed to properly apply generally accepted accounting practices in testing St. Joe’s real estate developments for impairment, resulting in the failure to take required write-downs on properties hit hard by the financial crisis.  SEC

October 26, 2015

Credit rating agency DRBS Inc. agreed to pay almost $6 million to settle SEC charges of misrepresenting its surveillance methodology for ratings of certain complex financial instruments during a three-year period.  An SEC investigation found that the firm misrepresented that it would monitor on a monthly basis each of its outstanding ratings of U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and re-securitized real estate mortgage investment conduits (Re-REMICs) by conducting a three-step quantitative analysis and subjecting each rating to review by a surveillance committee.  In fact, the review was not conducted on a monthly basis and when the committee convened it reviewed only a limited subset of ratings.  DRBS did not have adequate staffing and technological resources to conduct the surveillance promised by its surveillance methodology.  SEC

October 19, 2015

UBS advisory firms, UBS Willow Management LLC and UBS Fund Advisor LLC, agreed to pay $17.5 million to settle SEC charges arising from a failure to disclose a change in investment strategy used by UBS Willow Fund, a closed-end fund they advised.  UBS Willow Fund was marketed as one that primarily invested in distressed debt, a strategy predicated on the debt increasing in value.  In 2008, instead of focusing on investments in debt, UBS Willow Management had the fund purchase large quantities of credit default swaps, a strategy predicated on the debt decreasing in value.  Due to this change in strategy, the fund started incurring large losses and was liquidated in 2012.  UBS Willow Management did not provide adequate disclosure of the change in investment strategy to the fund’s investors or board of directors.  UBS Fund Advisor, which retained ultimate control over the fund, was aware of the change in investment strategy and failed to provide appropriate supervision by allowing the change without adequate disclosure.  SEC

October 14, 2015

As part of its enforcement initiative focused on violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M, the SEC settled enforcement actions against six firms: Auriga Global Investors, Sociedad de Valores, S.A., Harvest Capital Strategies LLC, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., Omega Advisors, Inc., Sabby Management LLC, and War Chest Capital Partners LLC.  Rule 105 is intended to preserve the independent pricing mechanisms of the securities markets and prevent stock price manipulation by prohibiting firms from participating in public stock offerings after selling short those same stocks.  Through its Rule 105 Initiative, first announced in 2013, the SEC has taken action on every Rule 105 violation over a de minimis amount that has come to its attention – promoting a message of zero tolerance for these offenses.  As a result of this Initiative, the SEC has seen a dramatic decrease in Rule 105 violations.  The firms identified in this round of enforcement have agreed to pay over $2.5 million to settle the SEC’s charges.  SEC

October 13, 2015

UBS AG will pay $19.5 million to settle charges that it made false or misleading statements and omissions in offering materials provided to U.S. investors in structured notes linked to a proprietary exchange trading strategy.  This is the first case by the SEC involving misstatements and omissions by an issuer of structured notes, a complex financial product that typically consists of a debt security with a derivative tied to the performance of other securities, commodities, currencies, or proprietary indices.  The return on the structured note is linked to the performance of the derivative over the life of the note.  UBS, one of the largest issuers of structured notes in the world, settled the SEC’s charges that it misled U.S. investors in structured notes tied to the V10 Currency Index with Volatility Cap by falsely stating that the investment relied on a “transparent” and “systematic” currency trading strategy using “market prices” to calculate financial instruments underlying the index, when, in fact, undisclosed hedging trades by UBS reduced the index price by about 5%.  SEC

October 8, 2015

New York-based proprietary trading firm, Briargate Trading LLP, and its co-founder, Eric Oscher, will pay more than $1 million to settle charges by the SEC of “spoofing.”  An SEC investigation found that Briargate and Oscher orchestrated a scheme in which they placed sham orders (“spoofs”), to create the appearance of interest in stocks and manipulate their prices, and then placed bona fide orders on the opposite side of the market to take advantage of the artificially inflated or depressed prices.  Immediately after the bona fide orders were executed, the spoof orders were cancelled.  Through this conduct, perpetrated between October 2011 and September 2012, Oscher and Briargate reaped approximately $525,000 in profits.  SEC

October 7, 2015

Three private equity fund advisers within The Blackstone Group will pay nearly $39 million to settle charges they failed to fully inform investors about benefits that the advisers obtained from accelerated monitoring fees and discounts on legal fees.  An SEC investigation found  that advisers Blackstone Management Partners, Blackstone Management Partners III, and Blackstone Management Partners IV, failed to adequately disclose the acceleration of monitoring fees paid by fund-owned portfolio companies prior to the companies’ sale or initial public offering.  These payments essentially reduced the value of the portfolio companies prior to the sale, to the detriment of the funds and their investors.  Additionally, the fund investors were not informed about a separate fee arrangement that provided Blackstone with a much greater discount on services by an outside law firm than the discount the law firm provided to the funds.  SEC

October 6, 2015

The SEC charged two former top executives at OCZ Technology Group Inc., a now-bankrupt seller of computer memory storage and power supply devices, with accounting failures.  The SEC’s complaint alleges that OCZ’s former CEO engaged in a scheme to materially inflate OCZ’s revenues and gross margins from 2010 to 2012, by, for instance, mischaracterizing sales discounts as marketing expenses, channel-stuffing OCZ’s largest customer, and concealing large product returns.  OCZ’s former CFO agreed to pay $130,000 in disgorgement and to be barred from acting as an officer or director of a public company  to settle the SEC’s charges against him of accounting, disclosure, and internal accounting control failures.  SEC

October 5, 2015

Cayman Islands-based Home Loan Services Solutions Ltd.(HLSS) will pay a $1.5 million penalty to settle SEC charges of making material misstatements about its handling of related party transactions and the value of its primary asset.  According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, HLSS misstated its handling of transactions with related parties.  For example, from 2012 to 2014, HLSS stated that to avoid potential conflicts of interest, it required its Chairman (also the Chairman of Ocwen Financial Corp.) to recuse himself from transactions with Ocwen.  However, HLSS had no written policies on recusals for related-party transactions and, in fact, HLSS’ Chairman approved many transactions with Ocwen.  In addition, according to the SEC’s order, HLSS misstated its net income in 2012, 2013, and the first quarter of 2014, because the methodology used to value its primary asset – billions of dollars of mortgage servicing rights purchased from Ocwen – did not conform to generally accepted accounting principles.  SEC

October 5, 2015

New York-based pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers Squibb will pay $14 million to settle SEC charges that its joint venture in China made cash payments and provided other benefits to health care providers at state-owned and state-controlled hospitals in China in exchange for prescription sales.  According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings, between 2009 and 2014, BMS China sales representatives sought to secure and increase business by providing health care providers in China with cash, jewelry, meals, travel, entertainment, and sponsorships for conferences and meetings.  SEC
1 81 82 83 84 85 108