Contact

Click here for a confidential contact or call:

1-212-350-2774

FCA Federal

This archive displays posts tagged as relevant to the federal False Claims Act. You may also be interested in the following pages:

Page 179 of 182

September 24, 2014

Shire Pharmaceuticals LLC agreed to pay $56.5 million to settle charges it violated the False Claims Act through improper marketing and promotion of several drugs used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and ulcerative colitis  Several former employees will receive a whistleblower award in an undisclosed amount. DOJ

Rose Cancer Center - Healthcare Fraud ($5.7 million)

Constantine Cannon represented a whistleblower in a False Claims Act case alleging Mississippi-based Rose Cancer Center used unqualified technicians performing bone marrow biopsies, diluted chemotherapy drugs, and falsified patient records to conceal the clinic’s fraudulent Medicare billings.  The physician who owned and ran the practice plead guilty to various Medicare fraud violations, forfeited $5.7 million, and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.  In August 2014, our client (along with three other whistleblowers) received a whistleblower award of $525,000 from the government's recovery.  Read more -- Clarion Ledger, CC.

D.C. Circuit Opines on What Constitutes Knowledge of Falsity Under the False Claims Act

Posted  09/11/14
By Jason Enzler The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion recently affirming a trial court’s grant of summary judgment against a qui tam relator.  The ruling in U.S. ex rel. Folliard v. Government Acquisitions, Inc. dealt with two issues: whether the lower court properly denied discovery of certain information and whether the defendant had “knowingly” submitted false claims...

Case Tests Tension Between False Claims Act and First Amendment

Posted  09/4/14
By Marlene Koury The much claimed but never proven tension between the False Claims Act (“FCA”) and First Amendment is being tested again in United States v. Millenium Pharmaceuticals Inc., currently pending in the Eastern District of California.  The whistleblower, a former pharmaceutical sales representative, alleges in his complaint that Millennium Pharmaceuticals illegally promoted the off-label use of...

Barker Decision Extends Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver to False Claims Act Cases

Posted  09/4/14
By Gordon Schnell
The attorney-client privilege is perhaps the most critical component of the attorney-client relationship.  As the Supreme Court declared in its landmark Upjohn decision, the privilege exists "to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observation of law and administration of justice."  As most would agree, without the privilege...

First Circuit Rules on Tax Deductibility of False Claims Act Settlements

Posted  08/28/14
By Jason Enzler The First Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision recently on a matter of first impression for the circuit: whether courts may consider factors outside of settlement agreements in False Claims Act cases in order to determine whether portions of a settlement can be deducted from a defendant’s tax liability. In ruling that courts can indeed look beyond the agreements, the First Circuit in...

DOJ Catch of the Week -- Bank of America

Posted  08/22/14
Bank of America Sign
This week's Department of Justice "catch of the week" goes to Bank of America.  Yesterday, the North Carolina based banking giant agreed to pay $16.65 billion to resolve federal and state mortgage fraud claims against the bank and its former and current subsidiaries, including Countrywide Financial Corporation and Merrill Lynch.  It is the largest civil settlement with a single entity in American history.   See 

Tagged in: Catch of the Week, FCA Federal, FIRREA, Housing and Mortgage Fraud,

DOJ Catch of the Week – Vascular Solutions

Posted  08/1/14
By the C|C Whistleblower Lawyer Team This week's Department of Justice "catch of the week" goes to Vascular Solutions Inc (VSI).  On Monday, the Minneapolis-based medical device maker agreed to pay $520,000 to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by marketing a product for sealing veins without FDA approval.  Specifically, the government charged that VSI marketed and sold its "Vari-Lase...

“Modest” Changes, or All-Out Assault on the False Claims Act?

Posted  07/31/14
By Jason Enzler The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing yesterday with the innocuous title “Oversight of the False Claims Act.” At issue was a set of proposed changes to the law offered by the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (“ILR”). According to an ILR representative’s testimony, the amendments would be “modest” and focused on correcting “flaws” and improving the “effectiveness”...